Primary research
We began by reviewing best practices from the Baymard Institute, along with previous research conducted by Heineken on similar products. The research highlighted key product card attributes that are important to users, including Volume, Product Image, Discount Indicator, Subtotal, Price, and Product Name. An A/B test had previously been conducted comparing a vertical product card design to a smaller horizontal version. The results showed that users preferred the control variant (vertical). Based on these insights, we chose to move forward with the vertical layout for our designs.
We also checked how competitors display products in the catalog, and for what type of layout they opt in different cases.
Most of the time, users prefer list view when they are searching with specific requirements while they love grid view for exploring.
The list view
Provides ample space for various textual elements like titles, descriptions, and reviews, allowing users to make informed decisions based on detailed information. For users who read left to right (LTR), the list is typically scanned from left to right. Therefore, it’s crucial to position the most important elements on the left, with less critical information placed to the right.
Provides ample space for various textual elements like titles, descriptions, and reviews, allowing users to make informed decisions based on detailed information. For users who read left to right (LTR), the list is typically scanned from left to right. Therefore, it’s crucial to position the most important elements on the left, with less critical information placed to the right.
The list view
Is about images. It limits the textual elements along with the images. Users usually can scan 4-6 grid items at a time. Making some space around the grid can help users receive information easily.
Is about images. It limits the textual elements along with the images. Users usually can scan 4-6 grid items at a time. Making some space around the grid can help users receive information easily.
Our approach is to let users decide which view works best for them. We aim to make the most of both the list view and the grid view, but without forcing an equal amount of information on each. If both views are treated the same, the grid view may become too lengthy, diminishing the benefit of offering both options. By providing distinct experiences, users can naturally choose the view that best suits their needs, while also discovering the unique advantages of each.
Adoption
Users using switch to grid view CTA more than switch to list view CTA (21% vs 5% of users)
The adoption rate stands at 45%, surpassing the target of 40%. This suggests that a significant number of users find value in the feature. The key takeaway is that we should explore ways to improve the onboarding process for new features.
Next Project →